Skip to main content
🧬Peptide Protocol Wiki

Peptides Similar to Bioglutide (NA-931)

Compare Bioglutide (NA-931) with related peptides and alternatives

Reviewed byDr. Research Team(MD (composite credential representing medical review team), PhD in Pharmacology)
📅Updated February 12, 2026
Verified

📌TL;DR

  • 4 similar peptides identified
  • Semaglutide: Moderate - Both target GLP-1 receptor for metabolic disease; semaglutide is FDA-approved while bioglutide is investigational
  • Tirzepatide: High - Both include GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism for metabolic disease; combination trial underway
Comparison chart of Bioglutide (NA-931) and similar peptides
Visual comparison of key characteristics

Quick Comparison

PeptideSimilarityKey Differences
Bioglutide (NA-931) (current)--
SemaglutideModerate - Both target GLP-1 receptor for metabolic disease; semaglutide is FDA-approved while bioglutide is investigationalSemaglutide is a selective GLP-1-only agonist peptide with injectable and oral (with SNAC) formulations. Bioglutide is a small-molecule quadruple agonist (IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP, glucagon) oral capsule requiring no absorption enhancers.
TirzepatideHigh - Both include GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism for metabolic disease; combination trial underwayTirzepatide is a dual GIP/GLP-1 peptide agonist (injectable only), while bioglutide adds glucagon and IGF-1 receptor agonism and is oral.
RetatrutideHigh - Both include GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptor agonism for obesityRetatrutide is a triple agonist injectable peptide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon). Bioglutide adds IGF-1R agonism and is oral. Both are investigational.
OrforglipronModerate - Both are oral small-molecule agonists for obesity treatment, both in clinical developmentOrforglipron is a selective GLP-1-only oral small molecule by Eli Lilly. Bioglutide targets four receptors and is developed by Biomed Industries.

SemaglutideModerate - Both target GLP-1 receptor for metabolic disease; semaglutide is FDA-approved while bioglutide is investigational

Differences

Semaglutide is a selective GLP-1-only agonist peptide with injectable and oral (with SNAC) formulations. Bioglutide is a small-molecule quadruple agonist (IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP, glucagon) oral capsule requiring no absorption enhancers.

Advantages

Quadruple receptor agonism, oral without SNAC, no fasting required, lower GI side effects (7.3% nausea vs 44%), muscle preservation via IGF-1R

Disadvantages

Not FDA-approved, very limited clinical data (Phase 2 only), no CV outcomes data, no long-term safety profile, small sample sizes

TirzepatideHigh - Both include GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism for metabolic disease; combination trial underway

Differences

Tirzepatide is a dual GIP/GLP-1 peptide agonist (injectable only), while bioglutide adds glucagon and IGF-1 receptor agonism and is oral.

Advantages

Two additional receptor targets (glucagon, IGF-1), oral administration, lower GI side effects, muscle mass preservation, no injection needed

Disadvantages

Not FDA-approved, far less clinical evidence, no long-term data, weight loss at 13 weeks vs tirzepatide's 22.5% at 72 weeks, no CV outcomes data

RetatrutideHigh - Both include GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptor agonism for obesity

Differences

Retatrutide is a triple agonist injectable peptide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon). Bioglutide adds IGF-1R agonism and is oral. Both are investigational.

Advantages

Additional IGF-1R target for muscle preservation, oral administration, lower GI side effects, no injection needed

Disadvantages

Retatrutide showed 24.2% weight loss (Phase 2, 48 weeks) vs bioglutide 13.8% at 13 weeks; retatrutide has more extensive Phase 2 data and is in Phase 3 (TRIUMPH program)

OrforglipronModerate - Both are oral small-molecule agonists for obesity treatment, both in clinical development

Differences

Orforglipron is a selective GLP-1-only oral small molecule by Eli Lilly. Bioglutide targets four receptors and is developed by Biomed Industries.

Advantages

Quadruple receptor agonism vs single target, muscle preservation, potentially lower GI side effects

Disadvantages

Orforglipron has more extensive Phase 2 data (36-week trial, Phase 3 underway with ATTAIN program), backed by Eli Lilly resources

Similarities and differences between Bioglutide (NA-931) and related peptides
Overlap and distinctions between related compounds

Bioglutide (NA-931) occupies a unique position in the anti-obesity therapeutic landscape as the only quadruple receptor agonist (IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP, glucagon) and the only multi-agonist designed for oral administration. It is compared below with the most clinically relevant agents, spanning approved therapies and investigational drugs.

All comparisons should be interpreted with caution given Bioglutide's early stage of development and the limitations of cross-trial comparisons.

Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy / Rybelsus)#

Semaglutide is the most established GLP-1 receptor agonist, developed by Novo Nordisk with three FDA-approved formulations. It serves as the current standard of care for pharmacological weight management.

Mechanism comparison: Semaglutide activates only the GLP-1 receptor. Bioglutide activates four receptors (IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP, glucagon), providing broader metabolic pathway coverage. The additional receptors may contribute to enhanced energy expenditure (glucagon), improved body composition (IGF-1), and complementary insulin secretion (GIP).

Efficacy comparison: Semaglutide 2.4 mg achieved 14.9% weight loss at 68 weeks in STEP 1, while Bioglutide 150 mg achieved 13.8% at only 13 weeks. Direct comparison is not possible due to different trial durations and populations. If Bioglutide's weight loss trajectory continues beyond 13 weeks (which remains to be demonstrated), it could potentially match or exceed semaglutide's efficacy.

Route and convenience: Injectable semaglutide requires weekly subcutaneous injection. Oral semaglutide (Rybelsus) requires SNAC absorption enhancer, strict fasting, and limited water. Bioglutide is an oral capsule with no fasting or absorption enhancer requirements, representing a significant convenience advantage.

GI tolerability: Bioglutide's GI side effect profile (7.3% nausea, 6.3% diarrhea) is dramatically more favorable than semaglutide 2.4 mg (44% nausea, 30% diarrhea in STEP 1).

Cardiovascular evidence: Semaglutide has a decisive advantage with two positive CV outcomes trials (SUSTAIN-6 and SELECT), including a 20% MACE reduction in SELECT. Bioglutide has no CV outcomes data.

ParameterBioglutide (NA-931)Semaglutide
Receptor targetsIGF-1 + GLP-1 + GIP + glucagonGLP-1 only
RouteOral (no enhancer)SC weekly or oral (with SNAC)
Weight loss13.8% (13 weeks)14.9% (68 weeks)
Nausea rate7.3%44% (2.4 mg SC)
Muscle preservationYesNot demonstrated
CV outcomesNone20% MACE reduction (SELECT)
FDA statusInvestigationalApproved (3 brands)
Market experienceNoneSince 2017

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound)#

Tirzepatide is a first-in-class dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist developed by Eli Lilly, FDA-approved as Mounjaro (T2D, 2022) and Zepbound (weight management, 2023). A Phase 2 combination trial of Bioglutide with tirzepatide is underway (NCT06732245).

Mechanism comparison: Tirzepatide activates GIP and GLP-1 receptors. Bioglutide activates these same two receptors plus glucagon and IGF-1. The additional glucagon agonism provides enhanced energy expenditure, and IGF-1 agonism supports muscle preservation.

Efficacy comparison: Tirzepatide 15 mg achieved 22.5% weight loss at 72 weeks in SURMOUNT-1, currently the highest weight loss of any approved anti-obesity medication. Bioglutide's 13.8% at 13 weeks cannot be directly compared, though the trajectory suggests potential for substantial further weight loss with longer treatment.

Combination potential: The ongoing Phase 2 combination trial (NCT06732245) is testing whether Bioglutide can enhance tirzepatide's efficacy while reducing its GI side effects and preserving muscle mass. Preclinical data showed synergistic effects.

Route: Tirzepatide is injectable only (weekly subcutaneous). Bioglutide is oral, potentially offering a complementary route in combination therapy.

Retatrutide (LY3437943)#

Retatrutide is an investigational triple agonist (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon) developed by Eli Lilly, currently in Phase 3 development (TRIUMPH program). It represents the closest mechanistic comparator to Bioglutide, sharing three of four receptor targets.

Mechanism comparison: Retatrutide activates GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptors. Bioglutide adds IGF-1 receptor agonism. The key mechanistic difference is Bioglutide's IGF-1R activity for muscle preservation and its oral formulation.

Efficacy comparison: Retatrutide achieved approximately 24.2% weight loss at its highest dose (12 mg) at 48 weeks in Phase 2, the greatest weight reduction reported for any anti-obesity agent. Bioglutide's 13.8% at 13 weeks reflects a much shorter treatment period.

Development stage: Retatrutide is in Phase 3 (TRIUMPH program) with larger datasets. Bioglutide has completed Phase 2 with smaller trials. Retatrutide is backed by Eli Lilly's substantial resources.

Route: Retatrutide requires weekly subcutaneous injection. Bioglutide offers oral daily dosing.

Orforglipron (LY3502970)#

Orforglipron is an investigational oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist developed by Eli Lilly, currently in Phase 3 development (ATTAIN program). It is the most direct oral comparator to Bioglutide, though it targets only one receptor.

Mechanism comparison: Orforglipron is a selective GLP-1-only agonist. Bioglutide targets four receptors. Both are small molecules designed for oral daily dosing without absorption enhancers.

Efficacy comparison: In Phase 2, orforglipron achieved approximately 14.7% weight loss at the highest dose over 36 weeks. Bioglutide achieved 13.8% at 13 weeks. Both demonstrate that oral small molecules can achieve weight loss approaching injectable GLP-1 agonist levels.

GI tolerability: Orforglipron's Phase 2 data showed GI side effect rates similar to injectable GLP-1 agonists (nausea approximately 35-50% depending on dose). Bioglutide's 7.3% nausea rate, if confirmed, represents a significant tolerability advantage.

Development resources: Orforglipron is backed by Eli Lilly's Phase 3 program (ATTAIN) with thousands of participants. Bioglutide is from the smaller Biomed Industries with limited Phase 2 data.

Summary Comparison#

FeatureBioglutideSemaglutideTirzepatideRetatrutideOrforglipron
Receptor targetsIGF-1+GLP-1+GIP+GCGRGLP-1GIP+GLP-1GIP+GLP-1+GCGRGLP-1
Molecular classSmall moleculePeptidePeptidePeptideSmall molecule
RouteOral dailySC weekly / oral dailySC weeklySC weeklyOral daily
Absorption enhancerNoneSNAC (oral)N/AN/ANone
Best weight loss13.8% (13 wk)14.9% (68 wk)22.5% (72 wk)24.2% (48 wk)~14.7% (36 wk)
GI nausea rate7.3%44%28%~25%~35-50%
Muscle preservationYesNoNoUnder studyNo
CV outcomesNonePositivePendingNoneNone
Regulatory statusPhase 2ApprovedApprovedPhase 3Phase 3
DeveloperBiomed IndustriesNovo NordiskEli LillyEli LillyEli Lilly

Key Differentiators#

Bioglutide's potential competitive advantages include:

  1. Only quadruple agonist: No other agent targets all four receptors (IGF-1, GLP-1, GIP, glucagon)
  2. Oral multi-agonist: The only multi-receptor agonist that is orally administered
  3. Muscle preservation: The only anti-obesity agent to demonstrate muscle mass preservation during weight loss (attributed to IGF-1R agonism)
  4. GI tolerability: Dramatically lower GI side effect rates than all current comparators
  5. No fasting or absorption enhancer: Simpler administration than oral semaglutide

Bioglutide's key disadvantages include:

  1. Limited data: Phase 2 only, small sample sizes, short treatment durations
  2. No CV outcomes: No cardiovascular benefit demonstrated
  3. Single sponsor: Biomed Industries is a small company compared to Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly
  4. No regulatory approval: Years away from potential FDA approval
  5. Undisclosed structure: Molecular details, binding affinities, and complete PK data not publicly available

Frequently Asked Questions About Bioglutide (NA-931)

Explore Further

Disclaimer: For educational purposes only. Not medical advice. Read full disclaimer