Skip to main content
๐ŸงฌPeptide Protocol Wiki

Rusfertide: Research & Studies

Scientific evidence, clinical trials, and research findings

Evidence Level: moderate
โœ“Reviewed byDr. Research Team(MD (composite credential representing medical review team), PhD in Pharmacology)
๐Ÿ“…Updated February 12, 2026
Verified

๐Ÿ“ŒTL;DR

  • โ€ข1 clinical studies cited
  • โ€ขOverall evidence level: moderate
  • โ€ข5 research gaps identified
Evidence pyramid for Rusfertide research
Overview of evidence quality and study types

Research Studies

Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera

Kremyanskaya M, Kuykendall AT, Pemmaraju N, et al. (2024) โ€ข New England Journal of Medicine

Phase 2 REVIVE trial evaluating rusfertide in phlebotomy-dependent PV patients. Part 1 (28-week dose-finding) followed by Part 2 (12-week randomized withdrawal). Demonstrated significant reduction in phlebotomy need and hematocrit control.

Key Findings

  • Response rate: 60% rusfertide vs 17% placebo (P=0.002) in randomized withdrawal
  • Mean phlebotomies per year reduced from 8.7 pre-treatment to 0.6 during treatment
  • Mean maximum hematocrit: 44.5% during treatment vs 50.0% before treatment
  • Improvement in MPN-SAF symptom scores for fatigue and pruritus
  • Grade 3 adverse events in 13%; no grade 4 or 5 events

Limitations: Phase 2 trial with 70 patients; open-label dose-finding period; 12-week randomized withdrawal may not capture long-term outcomes

Unlock full research citations

Free access to all clinical studies, citations, and evidence summaries.

150+ peptide profiles ยท 30+ comparisons ยท 18 research tools

Already subscribed?
Research timeline for Rusfertide
Key studies and discoveries over time

Community Experience Data

See how community outcomes align with (or diverge from) the research findings above.

Based on 15+ community reports

View community protocols

Explore research gaps across all peptides โ†’ | View clinical trial pipeline โ†’

๐Ÿ”Research Gaps & Future Directions

  • โ€ขLong-term safety and efficacy data beyond 2 years
  • โ€ขEffect on thrombotic event rates and overall survival in PV
  • โ€ขComparative efficacy vs ruxolitinib for hematocrit control
  • โ€ขOptimal dosing in combination with different cytoreductive regimens
  • โ€ขEfficacy in other conditions of iron excess (beta-thalassemia, MDS)

Research Overview#

Rusfertide (PTG-300) has been evaluated in a structured clinical development program for polycythemia vera, progressing from phase 1 healthy volunteer studies through the phase 2 REVIVE trial (published in NEJM) to the ongoing phase 3 VERIFY trial. The evidence demonstrates consistent efficacy in controlling erythrocytosis through a novel mechanism-based approach targeting iron metabolism.

The evidence level is classified as moderate based on positive phase 2 results published in a top-tier journal with a confirmatory phase 3 trial reporting positive topline results, though the phase 3 data have not yet been published in full peer-reviewed form.

REVIVE Trial (Phase 2)#

Kremyanskaya et al., NEJM 2024 (PMID 38381675)#

The REVIVE trial was an international, phase 2, two-part study conducted at 16 centers in the United States and India. It enrolled 70 adults with polycythemia vera who required phlebotomy (with or without cytoreductive therapy) to maintain hematocrit below 45%.

Part 1 (Dose-Finding, 28 weeks):

  • Open-label, dose-finding period
  • Starting dose: 20 mg SC weekly, titrated to maintain hematocrit <45%
  • Mean final weekly dose: 41.3 mg

Key Part 1 results:

  • Estimated mean phlebotomies per year decreased from 8.7 before treatment to 0.6 during Part 1
  • Mean maximum hematocrit decreased from 50.0% to 44.5%
  • Improvement in symptom scores on the MPN-SAF for fatigue and pruritus

Part 2 (Randomized Withdrawal, 12 weeks):

  • 59 patients randomized 1:1 to rusfertide (n=30) or placebo (n=29)
  • Primary endpoint: composite response (hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, completion of trial regimen)

Key Part 2 results:

  • Response rate: 60% rusfertide vs 17% placebo (P=0.002)
  • Hematocrit control maintained in rusfertide group; lost in placebo group

Safety in REVIVE#

  • Grade 3 adverse events: 13% of patients
  • No grade 4 or 5 adverse events
  • Injection site reactions: most common adverse event, grade 1-2 severity
  • No serious adverse events attributed to rusfertide

VERIFY Trial (Phase 3)#

The VERIFY trial (NCT05210790) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study evaluating rusfertide in phlebotomy-dependent PV patients.

Topline Results (2025)#

  • Primary endpoint met: 77% clinical response with rusfertide vs 33% placebo during weeks 20-32 (P<0.0001)
  • All 4 key secondary endpoints met with statistical significance:
    • Hematocrit control
    • Patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS Fatigue SF-8a)
    • MPN symptom assessment (MFSAF TSS-74)
  • Safety: Well tolerated; most adverse events were grade 1-2 injection site reactions; no new safety signals; all serious adverse events deemed unrelated to rusfertide

Two-Year Follow-Up Data#

Extended follow-up from the REVIVE study presented at ASH demonstrated:

  • Durable hematocrit control over 2 years of continued treatment
  • Sustained reduction in phlebotomy requirements
  • Injection site reactions decreased from week 32 to 52, suggesting improvement over time
  • No new safety concerns with extended use

Evidence Quality Assessment#

CriterionAssessmentDetails
Study designPhase 2 RCT + Phase 3Randomized withdrawal (Ph2); parallel group (Ph3)
Sample sizeModerate (Ph2: 70; Ph3: larger)Adequate for rare disease indication
Primary endpointMet in both trialsComposite hematocrit control endpoint
Symptom improvementSignificantMPN-SAF and PROMIS scores improved
Safety profileFavorablePrimarily injection site reactions
Regulatory pathwayBreakthrough TherapyFDA BTD granted
Peer-reviewed publicationYes (Ph2)NEJM 2024

Key Research Gaps#

  1. Long-term outcomes: Effect on thrombotic event rates and overall survival in PV, which require longer follow-up than currently available.

  2. Comparative trials: No head-to-head comparison with ruxolitinib or other cytoreductive agents for hematocrit control.

  3. Combination optimization: Optimal integration with hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib, or interferon in multimodal PV management.

  4. Other iron-excess conditions: Early-stage investigation in hereditary hemochromatosis and beta-thalassemia could expand the therapeutic scope.

  5. Biomarkers for response: Whether baseline iron parameters, JAK2 allele burden, or other markers predict response to rusfertide.

Frequently Asked Questions About Rusfertide

Explore Further

โš ๏ธ

Medical Disclaimer

This website is for educational and informational purposes only. The information provided is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before using any peptide or supplement.