Skip to main content
🧬Peptide Protocol Wiki

Melanotan-2: Molecular Structure

Chemical properties, amino acid sequence, and structural analysis

✓Reviewed byDr. Research Team(MD (composite credential representing medical review team), PhD in Pharmacology)
📅Updated February 1, 2026
Verified

📌TL;DR

  • ‱Molecular formula: C50H69N15O9
  • ‱Molecular weight: 1024.18 Da
  • ‱Half-life: ~1.5 h (rat IV, HPLC); no human plasma half-life reported

Amino Acid Sequence

Ac-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-D-Phe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2

43 amino acids

Formula

C50H69N15O9

Molecular Weight

1024.18 Da

Half-Life

~1.5 h (rat IV, HPLC); no human plasma half-life reported

3D molecular structure of Melanotan-2
Three-dimensional representation of Melanotan-2
Amino acid sequence diagram for Melanotan-2
Color-coded amino acid sequence of Melanotan-2

Molecular Structure and Properties#

Melanotan-2 is a peptide whose molecular structure and properties have been characterized through analytical chemistry and structural biology studies.

Amino Acid Sequence#

Molecular identity and sequence. Melanotan II (MT‑II) is a synthetic cyclic heptapeptide derived from the α‑MSH pharmacophore with the exact sequence Ac‑Nle‑cyclo[Asp‑His‑D‑Phe‑Arg‑Trp‑Lys]‑NH2. The N terminus is acetylated (Ac‑) and the C terminus is amidated (‑NH2). The sequence incorporates norleucine (Nle) in place of Met and D‑phenylalanine (D‑Phe) at the pharmacophore position corresponding to Phe7 of α‑MSH (His‑Phe‑Arg‑Trp) (pqac‑00000000, pqac‑00000001, pqac‑00000002, pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000005, pqac‑00000007).

Structural features. MT‑II is constrained by a side‑chain‑to‑side‑chain lactam (amide) bridge between the Asp γ‑carboxylate and the Lys Δ‑amine, producing a macrocyclic core comprising six residues (i→i+5, Asp5→Lys10) that enforces the His–D‑Phe–Arg–Trp pharmacophore geometry. The D‑Phe substitution and macrocyclization enhance potency and metabolic stability relative to linear α‑MSH analogs. The acetylated N terminus and amidated C terminus further reduce ionization and proteolysis susceptibility (pqac‑00000001, pqac‑00000002, pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000005, pqac‑00000007).

Molecular weight and formula. Experimental ESI‑MS shows [M+H]+ ≈ 1025 and [M+2H]2+ ≈ 513, consistent with a neutral molecular mass of ~1024.2 Da. One source also lists a molecular formula of C50H69N15O9 for MT‑II (pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000000).

Physicochemical properties (charge and pI; calculated rationale). Because the Asp and Lys side chains are covalently joined in a neutral lactam and both termini are blocked (Ac‑, ‑NH2), the only ionizable side chains in MT‑II are Arg (guanidinium, pKa ~12.5) and His (imidazole, pKa ~6.0). At pH 7.4, Arg is fully protonated (+1), while His is largely unprotonated (fractional charge ~+0.04), giving an estimated net charge of approximately +1.0 at physiological pH. The isoelectric point is dominated by deprotonation of Arg; a theoretical pI is therefore expected near pH ~12–12.5. These values are calculated from standard peptide pKa assumptions using the verified structural features above; direct experimental pI values were not reported in the retrieved sources (pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000005, pqac‑00000007).

Charge distribution and ionizable groups. The positive charge at physiological pH is localized primarily on the Arg guanidinium; the His imidazole contributes minimally and is sensitive to microenvironment. Asp and Lys side chains are neutralized by the intramolecular amide of the lactam, and the termini are nonionizable due to acetylation/amidation. The Trp indole, D‑Phe, and Nle side chains are nonionizable in aqueous physiological conditions (pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000005, pqac‑00000007).

GroupIonizable moietypKa (assumed)Participates in cyclization? (Yes/No)Present/active as ionizable in MT-II (Yes/No)Charge at pH 7.4 (expected)Notes
N-terminus (Ac-)N-terminal amine (acetylated, blocked)N/ANoNo0Acetylation blocks N-term; neutral
C-terminus (-NH2 amide)C-terminal carboxyl replaced by amideN/ANoNo0C-terminal amidation neutralizes carboxylate
Asp side chain (Îł-COOH)Carboxyl (COOH)3.9YesNo0Asp5 forms lactam with Lys10 (side-chain amide), so not ionizable in final macrocycle
Lys side chain (Δ-NH2)Amino (Δ-NH3+)10.5YesNo0Lys10 Δ-amino engaged in Asp–Lys lactam (neutralized)
His imidazoleImidazole (His)6.0NoYes~+0.04Partially protonated at pH 7.4 (Henderson–Hasselbalch estimate)
Arg guanidiniumGuanidinium (Arg)12.5NoYes~+1.00Fully protonated (positively charged) at physiological pH
Trp indoleIndole NH (not ionizable at physiological pH)N/A (~>16)NoYes (non-ionizable)0Indole is neutral under physiological conditions
D-PheNone (aromatic)N/ANoNo0D-Phe present (stereochemical modification), non-ionizable
Nle (norleucine)None (hydrophobic)N/ANoNo0Met -> Nle substitution at position 4; non-ionizable hydrophobic residue

Summary. MT‑II is Ac‑Nle‑c[Asp‑His‑D‑Phe‑Arg‑Trp‑Lys]‑NH2, a six‑residue macrocycle formed by an Asp5–Lys10 side‑chain lactam with D‑Phe7, N‑terminal acetylation, and C‑terminal amidation. It has a measured mass of ~1024.2 Da and, based on its ionizable groups, an estimated net charge of ~+1 at pH 7.4 and a calculated pI near 12–12.5 (pqac‑00000000, pqac‑00000001, pqac‑00000002, pqac‑00000003, pqac‑00000004, pqac‑00000005, pqac‑00000007).

Stability and Formulation#

Overview Melanotan-2 (MT‑II; Ac‑Nle‑c[Asp‑His‑D‑Phe‑Arg‑Trp‑Lys]‑NH2) is a cyclic heptapeptide whose aqueous chemical stability has been characterized in preformulation studies. Degradation in solution follows apparent first‑order kinetics, with a modest temperature dependence, a pH‑rate profile showing optimal stability near mildly acidic conditions, and measurable buffer catalysis. Specific degradation products were chromatographically observed but not structurally assigned in the available sources. Practical formulation guidance emerges from these data.

Kinetics and temperature sensitivity

  • First‑order decay across studied conditions; at pH 7.0 (0.02 M phosphate), representative Kobs ≈ 6.9×10−3 h−1 at 60 °C; accelerated studies at 50/60/70 °C yielded Arrhenius behavior with activation energy Ea ≈ 7.5 kcal·mol−1 and pre‑exponential factor A ≈ 1.3×10^3 h−1 (linear fit, r2 ≈ 0.98).
  • Arrhenius extrapolation to 25 °C gives Kobs ≈ 3.9×10−3 h−1 and t90 ≈ 26.9 h (≈1.1 days) in aqueous phosphate buffer; use extrapolation cautiously for peptides, though here the mechanism appeared consistent over 50–70 °C.

pH stability profile

  • Aqueous pH‑rate profile (measured at 60 °C across pH 2.0–9.5) shows maximum stability near pH ≈ 5.0. Empirical rate law indicates base‑catalyzed degradation contributes more than acid‑catalyzed: Kobs ≈ 0.015[H+]−0.102 + 0.047[OH−]0.127; the water term was negligible.
  • Practical implication: avoid high pH; mildly acidic formulations near pH ~5 minimize degradation.

Buffer and ionic strength effects

  • Phosphate buffer catalyzes degradation (general acid/base catalysis). Increasing phosphate concentration (e.g., 0.02 → 0.10 → 0.50 M) accelerates decay; rate models include buffer‑species terms (e.g., HPO4^2−). Conversely, ionic strength per se had negligible effect (I ≈ 0.15 vs controls).

Degradation pathways and products

  • HPLC chromatograms after prolonged storage show multiple degradant peaks; however, specific chemical identities were not assigned in these reports. General peptide pathways applicable to MT‑II—and likely contributors to the observed pH‑ and buffer‑dependent kinetics—include hydrolysis, imide/succinimide formation with subsequent deamidation/isomerization, oxidation, and photodecomposition. Residue‑level assignments (e.g., Asp isomerization, Trp/Nle oxidation) were not delineated in these sources.

Proteolytic and gastric stability (context for formulation)

  • In simulated gastric fluid (USP; pepsin, pH ~1.2, 37 °C), MT‑II is relatively stable to HCl; pepsin increases degradation, yet >90% of peptide remains over typical gastric emptying times in reported tests. MT‑II is described as more resistant to enzymatic inactivation than MT‑I in qualitative comparisons.

Formulation considerations

  • pH: Target ~5.0 to maximize chemical stability; avoid basic pH where hydroxide catalysis accelerates degradation.
  • Buffering: Use the minimum effective phosphate concentration to limit general buffer catalysis; control ionic strength (~0.15 with inert salts).
  • Containers/adsorption: Use polypropylene/plastic rather than glass to mitigate adsorption losses; at high pH, measure promptly to avoid precipitation.
  • Storage and use period: For aqueous stocks, refrigeration (4 °C) is recommended; prepare fresh weekly for concentrated stocks and use diluted aqueous preparations within ~24 h based on t90 projections and observed long‑term degradants even at 4 °C.
  • Lyophilization/light: The available sources did not report lyophilization protocols or photostability studies specific to MT‑II; general peptide risks of photodegradation are noted, but no MT‑II‑specific data were identified here.

Concise summary table

AspectKey FindingConditions/RangeQuantitative DataNotes
Degradation kinetics modelApparent first-order decay over studied conditionsAqueous phosphate buffers across pH 2.0–9.5; accelerated T 50–70°CExample: Kobs = 6.87×10^-3 hr^-1 (pH 7.0, 0.02 M PO4); other reported Kobs at pH 7.0: 0.0102 hr^-1 (50°C), 0.0155 hr^-1 (60°C), 0.0202 hr^-1 (70°C)Fits single-exponential (first-order) kinetics; multiple degradation pathways inferred
Arrhenius parameters and temperature sensitivityLinear Arrhenius behavior across accelerated T range50–70°C (accelerated studies)Ea ≈ 7.5 kcal/mol; A ≈ 1301.4 hr^-1; Arrhenius r^2 ≈ 0.98Apparent activation energy implies moderate temp sensitivity; extrapolation caveat noted
Extrapolated room-temperature stability (t90)Short predicted aqueous shelf-life at 25°C by Arrhenius extrapolationExtrapolated from accelerated dataKobs(25°C) ≈ 0.0039 hr^-1; t90 ≈ 26.9 hr (approx. 1.1 days)Extrapolation assumes mechanism constant; use with caution for peptides
pH-rate profile and optimum pHMaximum chemical stability near pH ~5.0; studied pH 2.0–9.5pH 2.0–9.5 (pH-rate measured at 60°C)Apparent orders: H+ ~-0.102; OH- ~+0.127. Fitted composite: Kobs = 0.015[H+]^-0.102 + 0.047[OH-]^0.127Shows non-integer empirical orders; uncatalyzed water term negligible
Acid vs base catalysis contributionHydroxide (base) catalysis more important than proton (acid) catalysisObserved across pH range; data often in 0.02 M phosphateKH+ ≈ 0.015; KOH- ≈ 0.047; K0 (water) ≈ -0.003 (not significant)Indicates avoid high pH; basic conditions accelerate degradation more
Ionic strength effectsIonic strength has negligible effect on rateIonic strength adjusted/checked (I ≈ 0.15 with KCl)No significant slope vs ionic strength (p > 0.05) reportedControl ionic strength in studies; effect small compared with pH/buffer
Phosphate buffer catalysisIncreasing phosphate concentration accelerates degradation (general acid/base catalysis)Phosphate tested at 0.02, 0.10, 0.50 M; studies include pH 9.11 experimentsBuffer terms included in rate model (K4[HPO4^2-] contribution noted)Minimize phosphate concentration in formulations when possible
Simulated gastric fluid / protease stabilityRelatively stable to HCl; pepsin increases degradation but much remains during gastric transitSimulated gastric fluid (USP) with pepsin at pH ~1.2–1.3, 37°CReported: >90% remains during typical gastric emptying (empirical observation)MT-II shows some proteolytic resistance relative to expectations for peptides
Identified degradation products / pathwaysMultiple chromatographic degradants observed; specific residue-level pathways not identified in these reportsChromatograms after storage and general peptide degradation mechanisms consideredStudies list likely mechanisms (hydrolysis, imide formation, deamidation, oxidation, photodecomposition) but no residue-specific LC-MS identificati...Degradants seen by HPLC; explicit chemical structures/LC-MS assignments not reported in these sources
Storage / reconstitution / formulation guidancePractical recommendations: maintain pH ~5, minimize phosphate concentration, control ionic strength (~0.15), avoid glass adsorption, refrigerate or...Aqueous stock 1 mg/mL; store refrigerated (4°C); use aqueous preps within 24 h; prepare fresh weeklyRecommendation summary (qualitative); also noted amenable to oral solid or short-lived liquid formsUse polypropylene containers to avoid adsorption; measure high-pH samples promptly; low-buffer formulations preferred
Chromatographic observation of multiple degradants at 4°C long-termParent peak plus multiple degradation peaks observed after long-term refrigerated storage10 ”g/mL in 0.02 M phosphate; stored at 4°C for 300 daysHPLC: parent (1) + degradants (2–4) visible in chromatograms after 300 dEven refrigerated aqueous solutions can accumulate degradants over months
Relative stability vs MT-I (proteolytic)MT-II reported more resistant to enzymatic inactivation than MT-IProtease assays: trypsin, chymotrypsin, pepsin (in vitro)Qualitative: described as "relatively stable to degradation" vs MT-I; no numeric fold-difference reportedUseful when considering proteolytic liability and delivery route selection

Conclusions MT‑II in aqueous solution degrades with apparent first‑order kinetics and modest Arrhenius temperature dependence (Ea ≈ 7.5 kcal·mol−1). Stability is maximized near pH ~5, with hydroxide‑catalyzed pathways dominating at higher pH and additional general acid/base catalysis from phosphate buffers. Ionic strength shows little direct effect. Multiple degradants are detectable chromatographically during prolonged storage, but residue‑specific mechanisms were not assigned in these reports. Formulations should minimize phosphate concentration, target mildly acidic pH, avoid glass containers, refrigerate aqueous solutions, and limit in‑use time; explicit lyophilization and photostability data for MT‑II were not found in these sources.

Pharmacokinetics#

Summary of available evidence. Quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) data for MT‑II are published primarily from animal studies; human studies of MT‑II have focused on pharmacodynamic responses and dosing, and do not report serum PK parameters. Rat studies provide IV disposition parameters and an estimate of intestinal bioavailability; human subcutaneous studies report timing of erectile responses but no Cmax/Tmax/AUC or clearance values. Related data for the deaminated MT‑II derivative bremelanotide (PT‑141) exist, but these pertain to a distinct compound and are not directly transferable to MT‑II.

Absorption.

  • Intravenous (reference): In rats given MT‑II 0.3 mg/kg IV, biphasic plasma decline was observed; absorption phase is not applicable to IV dosing (serves as 100% bioavailability reference).
  • Intestinal (in‑situ jejunal, anesthetized rat): After 6.76 mg/kg in‑situ jejunal dosing, Tmax ≈ 12 h and Cmax ≈ 860 ng/mL over a 60‑min window, with relative bioavailability ≈ 4.6% versus 0.3 mg/kg IV. These data indicate slow, limited enteral absorption.
  • Human subcutaneous context: In controlled clinical studies of subcutaneous MT‑II at 0.025–0.157 mg/kg, erections occurred with onset 15–270 min; however, no quantitative plasma PK (Tmax/Cmax/AUC) were reported.

Distribution.

  • Rat IV (0.3 mg/kg): The steady‑state volume of distribution Vss was approximately 0.5 ± 0.1 L/kg by HPLC assay (0.2 ± 0.02 L/kg by bioassay), exceeding blood volume and indicating appreciable extravascular distribution.
  • No human Vss data for MT‑II were found in retrieved sources.

Metabolism.

  • Rat: The disposition profile and assay differences suggest proteolytic degradation contributes to elimination; chemical cyclization and non‑natural residues in MT‑II confer improved protease stability relative to linear analogs.
  • Human: Specific biotransformation pathways for MT‑II were not reported in the available clinical literature.

Elimination and clearance.

  • Rat IV (0.3 mg/kg): Systemic clearance CL ≈ 0.3 ± 0.1 L·kg−1·h−1 (about 1.5 mL·min−1 in absolute terms), described as low extraction with restrictive clearance.
  • Route(s) of excretion were not delineated in the retrieved rat or human reports.

Half‑life.

  • Rat IV (0.3 mg/kg): Distribution (alpha) half‑life ~15 min; terminal (beta) half‑life ~1.5 ± 0.5 h by HPLC (bioassay estimated ~0.5 ± 0.1 h; authors judged HPLC‑derived t1/2 more reliable).
  • Human: No plasma half‑life values for MT‑II were reported in the retrieved clinical literature.

Bioavailability.

  • Absolute bioavailability (IV): 100% by definition for the IV reference in rats.
  • Enteral (in‑situ jejunal, rat): Relative bioavailability ≈ 4.6% compared with IV, indicating very low intestinal availability.
  • Human subcutaneous and intranasal: No absolute bioavailability values for MT‑II were identified in retrieved human studies; clinical reports document effective SC dosing without PK quantitation.

Embedded data table. The following table consolidates the quantitative values and key gaps.

SpeciesRoute (dose)Absorption (Tmax, Cmax)Distribution (Vss)Metabolism (notes)Elimination (CL, route)Half-life (t1/2)Bioavailability (F)Source
RatIV bolus 0.3 mg/kgCmax 2278.2 ± 374 ng/mL (HPLC) / 1911.2 ± 249.3 ng/mL (bioassay); Tmax not applicable (IV)Vss 0.5 ± 0.1 L/kg (HPLC) / 0.2 ± 0.02 L/kg (bioassay)Proteolytic degradation; chemical modifications increase stability vs proteases (assay-dependent detection of metabolites)CL ≈ 0.3 ± 0.1 L/kg·h (≈1.5 mL·min⁻Âč absolute)Alpha ~15 min; terminal (ÎČ) ~1.5 ± 0.5 h (HPLC) [bioassay: ÎČ ~0.5 ± 0.1 h]100% (IV reference)
Rat (anesthetized, in‑situ jejunal)In‑situ jejunal 6.76 mg/kg (0.4 mL)Tmax 12.0 h; Cmax 860 ng/mL; AUC0–60min = 732.5 ng·mL⁻Âč·hrNot reportedNot fully described; likely proteolytic degradation in gut/lumen affecting absorptionClearance/route not reportedNot reportedF ≈ 4.6% (relative to 0.3 mg/kg IV reference)
Human (clinical PD studies)Subcutaneous reported doses 0.025–0.157 mg/kg (clinical studies); typical MT-II clinical SC dose examples ~0.025 mg/kgNo quantitative human Tmax/Cmax reported for MT-II; pharmacodynamic onset/time‑to‑erection reported ~15–270 min and mean erection durations ~38–45 ...Not reported (no human Vss data found)Not reported in available human reportsNot reported in available human reportsNot reported in available human reportsNot reported (no human absolute F reported)Clinical PD/dosing context; quantitative human PK not reported for MT-II. Related peptide bremelanotide (distinct compound) shows SC Tmax ≈ 0.5 h a...

Contextual note on related peptide. Bremelanotide (PT‑141), a deaminated derivative of MT‑II, shows subcutaneous median Tmax ~0.5 h and mean terminal half‑life ~1.9–2.7 h in humans, but these PK metrics apply to PT‑141, not MT‑II. They are included only to contextualize the absence of human MT‑II PK; direct extrapolation is inappropriate.

Evidence limitations. Human quantitative PK parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC, clearance, Vss, bioavailability) for MT‑II were not reported in the retrieved clinical literature; available human studies focused on pharmacodynamic endpoints after SC dosing. Consequently, animal IV and intestinal data presently provide the clearest quantitative PK for MT‑II.

Frequently Asked Questions About Melanotan-2

Explore Further

Disclaimer: For educational purposes only. Not medical advice. Read full disclaimer