Skip to main content
๐ŸงฌPeptide Protocol Wiki

Enobosarm: Research & Studies

Scientific evidence, clinical trials, and research findings

Evidence Level: moderate
โœ“Reviewed byDr. Research Team(MD (composite credential representing medical review team), PhD in Pharmacology)
๐Ÿ“…Updated February 18, 2026
Unverified

๐Ÿ“ŒTL;DR

  • โ€ข3 clinical studies cited
  • โ€ขOverall evidence level: moderate
  • โ€ข8 research gaps identified
Evidence pyramid for Enobosarm research
Overview of evidence quality and study types

Research Studies

The selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial

Dalton JT, Barnette KG, Bohl CE, Hancock ML, Rodriguez D, Dodson ST, Morton RA, Steiner MS (2011) โ€ข Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

12-week phase 2 trial of 120 healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women randomized to enobosarm 1 mg, 3 mg, or placebo. Demonstrated dose-dependent lean body mass gains and physical function improvement.

Key Findings

  • Dose-dependent increase in total lean body mass at 1 mg and 3 mg vs placebo
  • Clinically meaningful improvement in stair climb test
  • No evidence of androgenic side effects
  • Transient ALT elevations in 8 subjects; 7/8 resolved while on drug
  • Significant reduction in SHBG at both doses

Limitations: 12-week duration; 120 participants; healthy elderly population (not obese); no GLP-1 co-administration

Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial

Dobs AS, Boccia RV, Croot CC, Gabrail NY, Dalton JT, Hancock ML, Johnston MA, Steiner MS (2013) โ€ข Lancet Oncology

Phase 2 trial in cancer patients evaluating enobosarm 1 mg and 3 mg vs placebo for prevention and treatment of cancer-associated muscle wasting. Demonstrated significant lean body mass gains at both doses.

Key Findings

  • Significant lean body mass gain: median 1.5 kg (1 mg) and 1.0 kg (3 mg) by day 113
  • Improvements in stair climb power at both doses
  • Improvements in quality of life measures
  • ALT elevations in 20.8% at 3 mg dose
  • Well tolerated overall; no virilizing effects reported

Limitations: Cancer population with heterogeneous tumor types and chemotherapy regimens; limited ~16-week duration; confounding effects of cancer progression

Study Design and Rationale for the Phase 3 Clinical Development Program of Enobosarm, a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator, for the Prevention and Treatment of Muscle Wasting in Cancer Patients (POWER Trials)

Crawford J, Prado CM, Johnston MA, Gralla RJ, Taylor RP, Hancock ML, Dalton JT (2016) โ€ข Current Oncology Reports

Design rationale for the Phase 3 POWER 1 and POWER 2 trials evaluating enobosarm 3 mg for muscle wasting in NSCLC patients. Trials ultimately did not meet co-primary endpoints of lean mass and physical function.

Key Findings

  • Lean body mass endpoint was met in both POWER trials
  • Physical function (stair climb) endpoint was not met
  • Co-primary endpoint design required both lean mass AND physical function improvement
  • Trial population of NSCLC patients initiating chemotherapy

Limitations: Phase 3 did not meet co-primary endpoints; cancer cachexia population may have confounding factors limiting physical function assessment; design paper rather than results publication

Unlock full research citations

Free access to all clinical studies, citations, and evidence summaries.

150+ peptide profiles ยท 30+ comparisons ยท 18 research tools

Already subscribed?
Research timeline for Enobosarm
Key studies and discoveries over time

Community Experience Data

See how community outcomes align with (or diverge from) the research findings above.

Based on 500+ community reports

View community protocols

Explore research gaps across all peptides โ†’ | View clinical trial pipeline โ†’

๐Ÿ”Research Gaps & Future Directions

  • โ€ขPeer-reviewed publication of QUALITY Phase 2b results (currently press release data only)
  • โ€ขLong-term safety of enobosarm beyond 16 weeks in obesity population
  • โ€ขPLATEAU trial results with tirzepatide (72-week trial planned)
  • โ€ขHead-to-head comparison with bimagrumab and other muscle-preserving approaches
  • โ€ขBone mineral density effects during GLP-1-induced weight loss
  • โ€ขCardiovascular safety with chronic use
  • โ€ขEffects in younger (<60 years) obesity population (FDA-encouraged expansion)
  • โ€ขLiver safety profile with long-term use (ALT elevations noted in prior trials)

Research Overview#

Enobosarm (Ostarine, GTx-024) has one of the most extensive clinical datasets of any SARM, spanning over 15 years of clinical development across multiple indications. The research program has evolved from cancer-associated muscle wasting (where Phase 3 trials did not meet co-primary endpoints) to a promising new application: muscle preservation during GLP-1 receptor agonist-induced weight loss.

The evidence level is classified as moderate based on published Phase 2 data in two peer-reviewed journals (JCSM 2011, Lancet Oncology 2013), positive Phase 2b QUALITY topline results (press release), and FDA regulatory feedback confirming an acceptable approval pathway. Full peer-reviewed publication of the QUALITY data and Phase 3 PLATEAU results are needed for definitive evidence classification.

Phase 2 -- Healthy Elderly (JCSM 2011)#

Dalton et al., J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011 (PMID: 22031847)#

The foundational Phase 2 trial enrolled 120 healthy elderly men (>60 years) and postmenopausal women in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Study Design:

  • 120 participants randomized to enobosarm 1 mg, 3 mg, or placebo
  • 12 weeks of oral daily dosing
  • Primary endpoint: total lean body mass (DXA)
  • Secondary endpoints: physical function (stair climb), insulin resistance, lipids

Key Results:

  • Dose-dependent increase in total lean body mass at both 1 mg and 3 mg
  • Clinically meaningful improvement in stair climb test
  • No evidence of androgenic side effects (prostate-specific antigen, sebum, hair)
  • Reduction in total cholesterol and triglycerides
  • SHBG significantly reduced at both doses (P<0.001)

Safety:

  • Transient ALT elevations in 8 subjects (6.7%)
  • 7 of 8 resolved while continuing treatment
  • 1 subject discontinued for ALT 4.2x upper limit of normal (resolved after discontinuation)
  • No clinically significant abnormalities in AST

Phase 2 -- Cancer Cachexia (Lancet Oncology 2013)#

Dobs et al., Lancet Oncology 2013 (PMID: 23499390)#

Phase 2 trial evaluating enobosarm in patients with cancer-associated muscle wasting.

Key Results:

  • Significant lean body mass gain: median 1.5 kg (1 mg) and 1.0 kg (3 mg) compared with baseline by day 113
  • Improvements in stair climb power
  • Quality of life improvements on FAACT-A and FACIT-F scales

Safety:

  • ALT elevations in 20.8% at 3 mg dose
  • Generally well tolerated
  • No virilizing effects reported

Phase 3 -- POWER Trials (Cancer Cachexia)#

Crawford et al., Curr Oncol Rep 2016 (PMID: 27138015)#

Two identically designed Phase 3 trials (POWER 1 and POWER 2) evaluated enobosarm 3 mg in NSCLC patients initiating first-line chemotherapy.

Outcome:

  • Lean body mass primary endpoint: MET in both trials
  • Physical function (stair climb) co-primary endpoint: NOT MET
  • Because the design required both co-primary endpoints, the program was considered unsuccessful

Interpretation: The failure to meet the physical function endpoint in advanced cancer patients receiving chemotherapy may reflect the difficulty of demonstrating functional improvement in a population with progressive disease and multiple confounding factors, rather than inadequate pharmacological activity of enobosarm.

Phase 2b -- QUALITY Trial (Obesity + GLP-1)#

Veru Inc. Press Releases (January and June 2025)#

The QUALITY trial represents the pivotal repositioning of enobosarm for obesity-related muscle preservation.

Study Design:

  • 168 patients aged >60 years with overweight or obesity
  • Randomized to enobosarm 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo, all receiving semaglutide (Wegovy)
  • 16-week treatment period + 12-week maintenance extension
  • Primary endpoint: lean body mass change

Key Results (Treatment Period, 16 weeks):

  • 71% reduction in lean mass loss with enobosarm vs placebo (all doses)
  • Enobosarm 3 mg + semaglutide: 0% lean mass loss, 100% fat mass loss
  • Physical function preserved (44.8% of semaglutide-only group had >10% stair climb decline)
  • Enobosarm did not increase GI adverse events above semaglutide alone

Key Results (Maintenance Extension, 12 weeks post-semaglutide):

  • Placebo group regained 43% of previously lost body weight
  • Enobosarm 3 mg reduced weight regain by 46%
  • Enobosarm completely prevented fat regain
  • Lean mass preserved during maintenance period

FDA Regulatory Pathway (September 2025)#

Following a successful FDA meeting, Veru received key regulatory guidance:

  • Enobosarm 3 mg confirmed as an acceptable dosage
  • Incremental weight loss over GLP-1 alone is an acceptable primary endpoint for approval
  • FDA encouraged expansion to include younger patients with obesity
  • Phase 2b PLATEAU trial with tirzepatide planned for Q1 2026

Evidence Quality Assessment#

CriterionAssessmentDetails
Published Phase 2 dataYes (2 trials)JCSM 2011 + Lancet Oncol 2013
Phase 3 (cancer)Did not meet co-primaryLean mass met; physical function not met
Phase 2b (obesity)Positive toplinePress release; peer review pending
FDA pathwayConfirmedAcceptable dose and endpoint
Safety database>1,000 patientsAcross all clinical programs
Peer-reviewed QUALITY dataPendingExpected but not yet published

Key Research Gaps#

  1. Peer-reviewed QUALITY publication: The pivotal obesity data are currently available only as press releases, limiting independent evaluation.

  2. Long-term safety in obesity: The QUALITY trial was 16 weeks; the PLATEAU trial (72 weeks) will provide longer-term data on liver enzymes, hormone levels, and cardiovascular markers.

  3. Younger population: The QUALITY trial enrolled patients >60 years. The FDA has encouraged expansion to younger adults with obesity.

  4. Comparison with other approaches: No head-to-head trial vs bimagrumab, trevogrumab, or apitegromab in the GLP-1 combination setting.

  5. Bone mineral density: The effect on BMD during GLP-1-induced weight loss has not been specifically studied.

  6. Liver safety with chronic use: ALT elevations have been observed at 3 mg; long-term hepatic safety data are needed.

Frequently Asked Questions About Enobosarm

Explore Further

โš ๏ธ

Medical Disclaimer

This website is for educational and informational purposes only. The information provided is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before using any peptide or supplement.