Editorial Policy

Every article on Peptide Protocol Wiki is built on peer-reviewed scientific literature. Our research process follows these principles:

• Primary sources: We cite original research papers, clinical trial data, and peer-reviewed publications. PubMed IDs and DOIs are provided for all referenced studies.
• Evidence hierarchy: We distinguish between preclinical (animal/in-vitro), Phase I-III clinical trials, and FDA-approved indications. Each peptide profile clearly labels its evidence level.
• Citation verification: All PubMed IDs and DOIs are verified against their source publications to ensure accuracy.
• No promotional claims: We do not make therapeutic claims beyond what the cited evidence supports. Content is informational and educational, not medical advice.

All content undergoes a multi-step review before publication:

1. Research and drafting: Content is researched and drafted using primary scientific sources and verified citations.
2. Medical review: Articles are reviewed by our medical review team with expertise in pharmacology, endocrinology, and peptide therapeutics.
3. Fact-checking: Key claims, dosing information, and study citations are independently verified before publication.
4. Regular updates: Published content is reviewed and updated when new research is published or existing information needs correction.

We take accuracy seriously. When errors are identified:

• Minor corrections (typos, formatting) are fixed immediately and the "last updated" date is refreshed.
• Factual corrections (incorrect data, citations, dosing information) are corrected promptly. The correction is noted in the article, and the medical review team re-verifies the updated content.
• Report an error: If you find inaccurate information, contact us at contact@peptideprotocolwiki.com.

We publish several distinct types of content:

• Peptide profiles: Comprehensive, multi-article profiles covering overview, molecular structure, dosing protocols, research studies, side effects, risks, and similar peptides.
• Research reviews: Summaries and analysis of published clinical research and preclinical studies.
• Comparison articles: Head-to-head analyses of similar peptides based on published data.
• Community evidence: Aggregated community reports are clearly labeled as anecdotal and never mixed with clinical evidence levels.

Our content is reviewed by qualified professionals with expertise in relevant fields. All reviewers hold advanced degrees (MD, PhD) in pharmacology, endocrinology, or related disciplines. View our medical review team profile for more information.

Peptide Protocol Wiki maintains editorial independence. Our content is not influenced by vendors, manufacturers, or advertisers. Vendor directory listings are informational and based on objective scoring criteria that are publicly documented.